Monday, April 23, 2012

The Economy - A Poem by Joel V Benjamin

I bought a computer with which to play;
It was not made in the U.S.A.
But in some place a world away
By children working 14 hours a day
In terrible conditions for their pay

It was not always this way
Unions used to have their say
And kept jobs from going away.

Businesses wanted wages low
So their jobs had to go

To other continents like Asia
To nations like China and Malaysia

How could we let this occur
Without so much as a stir?

Corporations gave politicians cash
To stuff workers’ rights in the trash

While the pols tell voters lies
The press fools all but the wise

As workers here saw their jobs flee
CEOs pocketed bonuses with glee

For cleverly cutting their cost
Never mind what else was lost

Fired workers searched classified pages
To find jobs with lower wages

Some found work; others did not
Americans’ savings dropped a lot

Consumers used credit instead of money
The economy continued to look sunny

Financial regulators looked the other way
As banks made borrowers their prey

The news media played their part
Letting bankers practice the art

Of bundling bad loans
That floated like stones

News consumers did not learn
Of financial fires that started to burn

Until the house of cards went up in smoke
And everyone from their dreams awoke

To the horror of an economy in collapse
Then the journalists could play taps

When brokerages bundled bad loans to their clients
Banking regulators didn’t worry about compliance

No one made the simple deduction
That financial instruments of mass destruction

Would cost tax payers many trillions
As individual speculators each made millions

Our government chose to give their thanks
By rescuing those predatory banks

While giving no such monetary relief
To those who suffered the grief

Of having their homes taken
And their whole lives shaken.

While we were stressed to the max
We saw the wealthy pay less tax

What’s wrong with this picture?
As we grew poorer, the rich got richer.

Politicians and judges should go to jail
For taking bribes to make the system fail

Bankers and brokers should pay their price
For taking our money and rolling the dice

Fire the financial regulators who let crooks
Take our money and cook the books.

When there’s true equality before the law;
The rich will be treated as are the poor.

Where is all the rage?
When will we engage

In a fight to save our land
And finally make a stand

Against the arrogance and greed
Of those who refuse to heed

The plea of workers everywhere:
“Give us our fair share

Of profits we helped you earn
You grew rich, now give us a turn.”

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Civil Rights - Some Essentials

Americans' misunderstanding about the nature of civil rights lead to arguments that are based on false premises.  The core properties of civil rights that I'd like to discuss in this article are:
  1. Civil rights are competitive
  2. Civil rights' conflicts are resolved by policies that limit the rights of the parties in conflict
  3. There are no absolute rights
  4. Some rights are more essential or basic than others
  5. A essential rights trump less important rights
Civil rights are competitive means that everyone's civil rights conflicts with someone else's. I am free to dance but not if I land on your feet. I can play music but not if it is so loud it damages your eardrums. One consequence of this obvious concept is that there are no absolute rights. There is no absolute right to dance or to play music or to speak or even to be born. Every right of one person may conflict with at least one of the rights of some other person.

Civil rights' conflicts are resolved by policies that limit the rights of the parties in conflict.  Laws that deal with these issues set limits on the rights of individuals when they conflict with equally important rights of other individuals. Row v Wade is an example of determining how to limit the rights of an embryo and its mother. I believe that did it in a thoughtful manner considering the rights of both parties to such conflicts. People who say that an embryo has an absolute right to be born do so be completely ignoring the rights of the other individual involved, namely the mother.

There are no absolute rights.  When anyone asserts that someone has an absolute right, they do so by ignoring or depreciating the rights of someone else.

Some rights are more essential or basic than others.  If I'm on fire, I should have the right to yell for help louder that it is pleasant for some people to hear. It is unlikely that I will prosecuted for disturbing the peace.

More essential rights trump less important rights.  I own a store. I have the right to serve who I want but I do not have the right to exclude customers on the basis of race.  If I did, it would stomp on the right of people to be served in public places.  I don't have the right to deny your rights.  This sounds simple but politicians every day assert their right to deny other people's rights.